Article share options
Share this on
Forward this by
- Copy website website website website link
A Hobart court has heard there is nothing sinister or untoward when you look at the actions of the convicted rapist and killer as he joined up with numerous sites that are dating and utilized an alias on Facebook.
- Curtis served 32 years in prison for rape, torture and murder and it is a subscribed intercourse offender
- The 64-year-old finalized as much as online dating sites and utilized an alias for Facebook while on parole
- Curtis had been sentenced to 3 months’ prison for breaching their community security purchase by perhaps perhaps maybe not reporting their internet activity to authorities
Jamie John Curtis had been paroled in June this past year after serving 32 years for the duplicated rape and torture of a 19-year-old girl and also the murder of her fiance in 1986.
Curtis is just a sex that is registered and it is regarding the Community Protection sign up for life.
On the list of conditions imposed on individuals in the register would be that they need to report any phones that are mobile internet reports, account names and passwords to police.
The Magistrates Court heard within months of their launch, Curtis had joined three internet internet dating sites — an abundance of Fish, sexy Date and Zeus — and had a Facebook account utilizing a fake title.
The facebook was used by him messenger solution to deliver two communications to a female he previously started dating after meeting her online.
The 64-year-old pleaded responsible into the Magistrates Court in Hobart to breaching the Community Protection Order and a restraining purchase.
Curtis has been around custody since police searched their automobile and house in October this past year — seizing their cellular phone.
He had been additionally faced with fraud offences but those charges were dismissed, after prosecutors tendered no evidence today.
Curtis ‘not especially able using the internet’
Defence attorney Fabiano Cangelosi stated Curtis had “a belated 1980s comprehension of technology” and “a naive concept of your skill with a cell phone”.
“He was created in 1955, jailed in 1986 and paroled this past year, ” Mr Cangelosi stated.
“the consequence of which was that in 1986 as he visited prison, he knew of computer systems but he did not get one … he previously extremely use that is limited of computer in jail.
“Emerging from prison he had been really an individual placing a base to the century that is 21st an awareness of technology from the 1980s. “
Mr Cangelosi stated that while Curtis had finalized to state he comprehended the conditions regarding the Community Protection Order and carried a duplicate from it he did not really have a practical understanding of what the internet was with him on his phone.
“He isn’t specially able aided by the internet, ” Mr Cangelosi stated.
He stated their customer “thought that the world-wide-web had been a fixed thing” that needed an even more active procedure to activate with and had been “naive” in what their cellular phone could do.
Mr Cangelosi stated the alias Curtis utilized on Facebook wasn’t intended to avoid authorities detection, but instead because he had been conscious that he is the target of unwelcome attention as a result of their previous crimes.
There is “nothing by itself untoward in what Curtis had been doing on the internet sites that are dating, his attorney stated.
Offences ‘not that serious': magistrate
In sentencing, Magistrate Michael Daley stated he accepted the breach had been in component because Curtis have been in prison since 1986 and failed to grasp the web.
“we additionally accept Mr Curtis had not been anything that is doing having an alias on Twitter … I think many would accept that, including me personally who’s additionally on Facebook, ” he stated.
“To commit these offences while on parole is severe which is certainly an aggravating element. “
Not surprisingly, he stated the offences had been “not that serious”, but that any more offending would probably to see their face more substantial imprisonment.
Mr Daley sentenced Curtis to a jail that is three-month — backdated by 6 months to consider the full time he had invested in jail because the breaches.
Curtis’ parole for their life phrase ended up being revoked during his amount of time in custody and then he shall want to re-apply into the Parole Board become re-released from jail